Knowledge Report

To All Scientology Public
cc: OSA
     RTC Reports Officer
     Flag Data Files
     Int Justice Chief

In Scientology there are various ethics reports aside from Knowledge Reports that are used and these are covered in the HCO PLs “Staff Member Reports,” “Things That Shouldn't Be,” “Out Tech” and “Knowledge Reports” to name a few.

This system of reports from my observation and in my opinion has been misused to a great degree by members of the Church still active in the organization to "rat out" certain individuals who do not go along with "command intention", even though that intention may in fact violate the policies of the Scientology organization or the purpose it was established for, which in fact according to the Admin Scale given in HCO PL “Organizational Sanity” is above and therefore senior to policy.

Worse, ethics reports have been used to detect individuals who have "counter intention" to these illegal and cross orders that violate LRH policy and the purpose of the organization. For example a person writes a Knowledge Report, Things that Shouldn't Be Report, Out Tech report or any kind of report on the fact that David Miscavige whose post title is Chairman of the Board (COB) has given his interpretation of what an "F/N" should look like and that it must go back and forth at least three or four times before it can be considered a "valid F/N" even though there is no such HCOB that gives the proscribed number of times an F/N must go back and forth before it is considered an F/N.

Not only that but any Auditor who is caught indicating an F/N that doesn't follow this verbal definition is immediately sent to Ethics in violation of HCOPL Tech Recovery. Yet anyone who would write a report stating the above ends up being harassed by Qual and Ethics.

Another example is the Golden Age of Tech which is a series of drills developed in 1996 and now currently in use in Auditor training. Not only are there a myriad of technical errors in the actual drills themselves but they violate HCO PL Drills Allowed. However if you reported this salient fact to HCO or RTC you will immediately find yourself either in Ethics or Qual or both.

How do I know this? Because in both cases when I reported these gross violations of policy and tech I ended up in Qual and when I demanded an HCOB that clearly stated that an F/N had to go back and forth a certain number of times or a policy that canceled HCO PL Drills Allowed I was promptly routed to Ethics for being "uncooperative". In other words I wouldn't accept verbal tech or "reasonable" rationalizations of why it was okay to have an auditor stare myopically at the meter waiting for an "F/N" while the PC was overrun into next Tuesday or why it was alright to mis-train Auditors, which by the way is in direct contravention to point 4 of HCO PL Keeping Scientology Working, into a bunch of perfect robots with the ARC and warmth of an ice cube!

However this isn't the point of this Knowledge Report. The point I'm trying to make here is that the system in use to keep Tech Standard and Policy in so that the Organization can achieve its purpose has been perverted to a means of maintaining a fixed idea and ensuring that the current individual in control of Scientology has unquestioned authority over the organization by eliminating those who he considers to be in opposition to his "command intention".

So if you wonder why these reports are now spilling out onto the internet. You need look no further than the above.

Written by RJ