Scientology Dissemination | Print |
Wednesday, 21 April 2010 22:35

I have been involved with Scientology dissemination for many years.

I wrote the old Dianetics website in use from 2002 to 2008. I wrote the sales materials for Dianetics and a host of other LRH books, lectures and services back before the Church lost every shred of decency. To date, I have some 300,000 words published as a Scientology writer for every single Scientology product and service, and two dozen related corporations, including some 150 brochures and fliers, almost all the tech film ads, dozens of TV spots, and more. I have written so many fantastic and successful campaigns that sold LRH products on their MERIT, not based on putting a gun to people’s foreheads and telling them “If you don’t buy it we’re going to put you on the meter and find out why!”

Many Independents, in confronting the existing state of Scientology, have despaired. As Idle Org wrote recently, “What we probably aren’t confronting fully yet is the fact that Miscavige has ruined the names Scientology, Dianetics, L. Ron Hubbard, E-Meter, OT, Clear, etc, etc, etc, permanently in the eyes of the non-Scientology world.”

True, but the damage is not permanent.

In my experience with dissemination, I have found there still IS one effective way to disseminate Scientology.

In 2007 I started working to disseminate to a friend. Nothing I said worked. Yet this person was very spiritual, and very interested in anything that approached Scientology technology. But when it crossed the line into actual Scientology, forget it. Nothing could interest her. And so I started to use my attempts to disseminate to her as a learning experience, a sort of dissemination laboratory to find out what really would work. It took a year and a half, but I finally cracked the problem right down the middle and got that person started on the Bridge the next day. Here’s what I did.

Step One of HCO PL 23 October 1965, DISSEMINATION DRILL is “Contact”:

1 . Contact the individual: This is plain and simple. It just means making a personal contact with someone, whether you approach them or they approach you.

Step Two “Handle” is where it all seemed to break down:

2. Handle: If the person is wide open to Scientology, and reaching, this step can be omitted as there is nothing to handle. Handle is to handle any attacks, antagonism, challenge or hostility that the individual might express towards you and/or Scientology. Definition of "handle": to control, direct. "Handle" implies directing an acquired skill to the accomplishment of immediate ends.

But I was schooled in a David Miscavige version of the Dissem Drill whereby the “Handle” step was altered into “Handle the person’s Black PR.” Well, I finally reviewed the policy and that’s not what LRH wrote. I had false data.

The problem today is NOT black PR but genuine, on-going, ruthless criminality saturating the entirety of the Scientology network, and most definitely emanating from the top down... from the leader of the Church himself, David Miscavige -- a self-appointed dictator who has subverted Scientology.

LRH says : “‘Handle’ implies directing an acquired skill to the accomplishment of immediate ends.”

The question was, what “acquired skill” would handle the person’s challenge and or antagonism toward Scientology? Here’s what worked for me.

First off I asked myself one day, “Why the hell am I covering up for David Miscavige and condoning his crimes and abuses?” That’s crazy! I decided, “You know what? I support Truth. Scientology is supposed to be all about Truth. So let’s go with that: back to the philosophic roots --Truth, whether good, bad or ugly. People who support truth, that's who matters!”

I had literally been working on this person for a year and a half and had gotten nowhere.  I could not interest this person in Scientology for the life of me. Yet through my writings on the old Dianetics website I've probably sold more Dianetics Self Improvement Kits than anyone on the planet. I certainly didn’t have anything to lose.

With my new stable datum, I sat down for a big feast and ate crow. I exposed what I knew about on-going and past criminality. I was honest about it. Instead of denying and getting angry if asked certain questions, I just came clean and admitted everything freely without withholding anything. I handled questions about LRH the same way. I told them all about the Int base and what went on there.

I found out the person had been curious for a long time but everytime they had asked questions, instead of answering properly, I got mad. So actually, I had never properly and calmly answered their questions. They were fascinated with the tale of criminality and abuse. Privately, I was thinking "This person will never be interested in the tech now."

Then I said what I was doing about the situation, i.e., planning a website to blow the whistle on such abuses. Like a lightbulb flipping on, instantly my prospect and I were in full communication and she reached for the tech. Not only was the truth accepted, but she allowed the tech to come into her life and started auditing the next day. She is still on the Bridge today.

What did I really do here?

It was the Liability formula on the Third Dynamic. It wasn’t my personal Liability. It wasn’t me who has been receiving a six figure income as a Sea Org member when everyone else gets $0.50 cents an hour. It wasn’t me busting up families and marriages, ordering Sea Org parents to murder their unborn children, abusing staff and torturing them through intense sleep deprivation like what went on at Flag for years. But I was a group member.

If you know about abuses, the human race expects you to come clean on it and get it out on the table so it can be addressed.

So what acquired skill did I use? Ethics, specifically, the Liabilty Formula.

1. Decide who are one’s friends.

2. Deliver an effective blow to the enemies of the group one has been pretending to be a part of despite personal danger.

3. Make up the damage one has done by personal contribution far beyond the ordinary demands of a group member.

4. Apply for reentry to the group by asking the permission of each member of it to rejoin and rejoining only by majority permission. And if refused, repeating (2) and (3) and (4) until one is allowed to be a group member again.


So to the DM-bots who say by attacking the Church we will destroy Dissemination, no... No. Exposing DM’s crimes is the best thing that could happened to the Church.

Scientology-cult.com, Marty's website and others have restored real and genuine interest for the Tech. It has rehabilitated countless waning Scientologists. It is reviving the Scientology field that was all but killed off by Derelict Miscavige.

The Liability formula will “handle any attacks, antagonism, challenge or hostility that the individual might express towards you and/or Scientology.”

Now that the person is handled, steps Three and Four are easy.

“Once the individual has been handled you then --

3. Salvage: Definition of salvage: "to save from ruin". Before you can save someone from ruin, you must find out what their own personal ruin is. This is basically -- What is ruining them? What is messing them up? It must be a condition that is real to the individual as an unwanted condition, or one that can be made real to him.

4. Bring to understanding: Once the person is aware of the ruin, you bring about an understanding that Scientology can handle the condition found in 3. This is done by simply stating Scientology can, or by using data to show how it can. It's at the right moment on this step that one hands the person a selection slip, or one's professional card, and directs him to the service that will best handle what he needs handled.


I have created heavy reaches for the tech in this way because it is the correct handling.

The truth MAKES SENSE TO PEOPLE. They say, “Well, no wonder. I thought something was going on. It had to be.” And they are relieved to hear that the leader of the Church is a crook and no Scientologist.

Unilaterally the next response is "Wow! So what IS Scientology anyway?" Now they are reaching for the tech. They are HANDLED.

At least in my case, the reason for past failures with the Dissem Drill was False Data. You can’t handle antagonism by dismissing all rumors as “Lies, lies -- all lies!” There IS out ethics. One non-Scientologist who only read my site and Marty's said, "Scientology is the most misunderstood subject on the planet! I get it. There's a wolf in the hen house."

Here is the de facto "formula" SP Miscavige is following -- nothing but pure criminality:

1. Force others to decide that he is their only true friend.

2. Attack and ruthlessly destroy everyone who refuses to realize that "he is Scientology!"

3. Take every last penny they’ve got and keep them so pinned down by debt and so busy running from Ethics officers that they have no time to catch him, much less organize any real resistance. And if they won’t heed the wrong conditions, buy their silence with cash.

4. Only permit those who do his bidding the way he wants without question to carry on up the Bridge. Tie up the rest in interrogations, sec checks and needless review actions.

Thoughtful