Michael Walimaa, Resignation | Print |
Saturday, 29 September 2012 09:33
There is more wisdom in the communication formula alone than humans are used to having access to.  The first time TR0 blows you away, you know you have experienced something the bulk of the world seems to be unaware of.  Scientology is data of the highest order.  It is being presented to beings who aren't even there.  What could possibly go wrong?

L Ron Hubbard warned us of what could go wrong.  It has gone wrong.  What now?

The first order of business is to announce that I am resigning fromm the Church of Scientology because it is and has been a criminal activity for approximately 30 years.

My name is Michael Walimaa, I discovered Scientology in 1975.  Until a week ago, I was a registrar at the Nashville Celebrity Center.  It was my first go at being on staff, and I had only been there for 9 months.  I am also a Patron of the IAS.  After 37 years and $250,000, my training and auditing level is negligible.  I have done the full Basics book and lecture course.  Within the last two years, I did the Purification Rundown - for the third time (I have never done drugs), and I have put about 350 hours into the Objectives.  This was the first auditing action I have ever had that was done in the correct sequence, and done correctly and fully.  The objectives woke me up.  The tech does work.  I could attribute the fact that it took 37 years and a quarter of a million bucks to get my objectives (almost) done, to my own shortcomings.  Of course, I entered Scientology to address my shortcomings, and they assured me they could.  The added time and money in the cycle seems impossible.  But there is no denying that I have yet to fully complete one bridge step in 37 years, so an awful lot of time and money got thrown at things that had nothing to do with becoming a trained auditor, or moving up the bridge.

While on Opening Procedure by 8C, the last thing I ran, I realised that Communism had entered my Church.  "From each according to their ability; to each according to their need." - the operating basis of Communism, and the IAS.  Then I remembered that LRH hated the idea of "subsidizing " an organization.  Ours are all supposed to be self-supporting.  Compare the two following scenarios:

1.    The Church members donate to buy hundreds of thousands of WAY TO HAPPINESS BOOKLETS.  The Church distributes them to an enturbulated populace.  The locals rise in tone.  The local government has been by-passed.  They are incensed that someone else is controlling "their" people.  The locals run straight into the suppression of their own governments.  The perfect recipe for roller-coastering people.

2.    The WAY TO HAPPINESS foundation, being self-sufficient (per policy) sells their program to the local government.  The city pays for the booklets.  The city management is now the cause point, and is doing something good and in-exchange for their own people.  The people and their leaders are on the same page, or at least have to pretend to be.  The Church members get to keep their own money, having earned it, and actually do flourish and prosper.  Their friends and relatives can see that they are flourishing and prospering, and want to know how they are doing it.  And no one is just PRing anyone else.

It is patently impossible to give every dollar you can scrape up to the "fourth dynamic", and yet flourish and prosper.  This is a violation of every financial policy and principle of exchange ever written.  And your attempts to appear that you are flourishing and prospering will not fool your friends and family.  It is THEIR kind hearts that prevent them from telling you what they really think of the life you are leading.  They DON'T gauge you as a success.  They just feel sorry for you that you don't even have the time or money to get home and visit your relatives once in a normal while - despite the fact that you are working your ass off.

Why am I not quoting policy like all those who have gone before me?  Because the Church is the equivalent of the Callao fortress LRH references in "The Responsibilities of Leaders".  Eight thousand died when Simon Bolivar insisted on trying to take that fortress.  I have read of scores of you charging those gates with the most carefully assembled and sincere "evidences" and "references", only to be stopped at the gate.  Like Ron said, and I am just too lazy to type out the whole quote, just put a large number of our own troops in a distant position of offense but ease and comfort and say, "We are not going to fight.  The war's over, silly man.  Look at the silly fellows in there, living on rats when they can just walk out and sleep home nights or go to Spain or enlist with me or just go camping", and let anybody walk in and out who pleased, making the fort commander (Rodil) the prey of every pleading wife and mother and would-be deserter or mutineer within.  This is probably exactly what will happen, and already is.

David Miscavige is in a condition of Power in the destruction of the Church.  He cannot destroy the tech beyond our ability to restore it, I don't think, but the Church is not so lucky.  The man is formidable, intelligent, and must be a pretty sizable being.  He almost seems to be able to "glow" things wrong.  For him to be able to hold any form together after thirty years of his own abuses is actually rather impressive.  Someday, if he ever actually gets cleaned up and makes up for the damage (what would THAT take), we could all have a good laugh over this.  Right now, it is not the least bit funny.  

When DM does blow, as it states in the same "Simon Bolivar" reference, he will move off with unlimited funds in his private account, with potential blackmail on erstwhile enemies (sec checks), and bribe some country to let him live there.  He will probably not do the remaining steps: he will not pay all his obligations on the nail, he will not empower all his friends as he does not trust anyone but himself to have power, and he won't keep his nose out of things.  He HAS to be on a stage.  All this will be his undoing, and I don't envy what his future will be.

I didn't expect LRH to be perfect.  I don't expect those Scientologists outside of the Church to be perfect.  It would help if we were, but we don't have to be.  We will have to deal with our own alterations, M/Us, dillitantes, serve-facs, PR problems, etc., etc.  LRH has solutions as long as we remain "theta the solvers", and not "entheta, the poor victims of David Miscavage and his cronies."    A lot of decent things appear to be getting done while we wait for all the wives and mothers to take out DM.  I am so happy to see this.

Well, it was hell while it lasted.  Can't wait to see what we collectively do.  What would Ron do?


Michael Walimaa
22 Sep 2012
Nashville, TN