<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Black Propaganda</title>
		<description>Discuss Black Propaganda</description>
		<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/black-propaganda.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:53:52 --600</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.scientology-cult.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/409/10.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>RE: Black Propaganda</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/black-propaganda.html#comment-3599</link>
			<description><![CDATA[id LOVE to know where those earth rods are..... id re-route them to the mains.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>KD</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 16:42:40 --600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/black-propaganda.html#comment-3599</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Right on</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/black-propaganda.html#comment-3391</link>
			<description><![CDATA[That nails it Leonore.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Thoughtful</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 11:51:04 --600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/black-propaganda.html#comment-3391</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>RE: Black Propaganda</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/black-propaganda.html#comment-3386</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I just read the OSA NW orders at the link cited by Karen. The citations for the OSA orders are listed on the issues. Most of the issues were originally LRH PLs or LRH EDs or Guardian Orders. Two key LRH statements in the Black Propaganda issue (now OSA NW Order 15) are: 1. "Our propaganda is dirty BUT IT IS NOT BLACK BECAUSE IT IS TRUE. Black propaganda is essentially false." (caps my emphasis) 2. "We won't be running a black campaign as we deal in truth." At the time these issues were written the GO was mainly focused on and dealing with an external conspiracies against Scientology and LRH. These were documented, and they crossed government, medical, psychiatric, financial and other lines. The issues trained GO staff to understand the mechanisms of black propaganda (negative ad campaigns if you wish) so that we would recognize them. The issues also instructed GO staff how to use investigation and TRUTH to expose conspirators and back them off their attacks. It was all about how to investigate and counter black PR! As I said above,it seems to me that OSA, now that it is under the control of David Miscavige, is more focused on covering up David Miscavige's abuses and in going after whistleblowers than it is fulfilling the mission LRH set forth. =Off-purpose; Wrong target. Re Paulette Cooper, mentioned by others - an overt and OFF-POLICY operation committed by a few specific GO staff. (LRH said our campaigns had to be based on TRUTH, remember). One of the principals who designed and ran that op died young of brain cancer - sad, coincidental justice - long before the raid. Paulette tried to make a name for herself as an investigative writer with her not very well researched, sensationalized book on Scientology. False reports and conspiracies that threatened LRH and Scientology DID happen. Paulette was just kind of a mouthpiece for some of that. If one has had case gain, wins, and life-changing cognitions in Scientology, then that person would understand why people would be passionate to fend of threats to the existence of Scientology (in the ethical way LRH described). On the other hand, if a person has had no wins or has never had good service, all this would seem to be a crazy, evil scam. Best wishes to all, Leonore]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Leonore</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 03:47:22 --600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/black-propaganda.html#comment-3386</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>RE: Quite informative</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/black-propaganda.html#comment-3371</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Bruce, 1. I wrote about why LRH PLs and LRG EDs had restricted distribution because I thought that's what you were asking. If that isn't what you asked, sorry, but I didn't understand your question. If you have read the original LRH materials (online or wherever) you will see they are actually quite socially informative. 2. I never saw an issue from LRH ordering or authorizing or even encouraging illegal or criminal activity - quite the contrary. 3. The Admin scale must be kept in mind - LRH articulated goals, purpose, policy, and occasionally gave the goal for a broad program - always with intention of protecting Scientology with truth and exposees of suppression and with increasing the acceptance and value of Scientology in society with workable technology. Others down the org board issued more specific programs, projects, orders. 4. I can't speak for OSA or its orders. I can only observe that OSA is not the autonomous network that LRH established in policy. OSA is now run by the Sea Org and ultimately by David Miscavige. Strikes me that OSA is mostly used as a tool to "sic" on the ever growing field of former or questioning Scientologists - way off-purpose and profoundly wasteful and destructive. Leonore]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Leonore</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 02:42:16 --600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/black-propaganda.html#comment-3371</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Quite informative</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/black-propaganda.html#comment-3288</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thanks Leonore. The HCO PL being confidential is not my question. But almost all the OSA NW orders are based on GO advices or some other comm most specifically not a PL. By that very distinction, their distribution would be limited. As far as out reality being a basis for secrecy, we could have a heck of a lively discussion on certain Scientology principles regarding out reality and public acceptance. Then there is the possibility that the reissue of the orders was in fact an alter is of some minute to large degree. Does a "GO only" issue correlate to a confidential issue to OSA? You hit a very salient point on GO vs OSA. Not the same organization at all although the behavior may have been similar in some circumstances. A lot of this is added inapplicable significance on my part, no doubt. But having read most of the OSA NW issues, I missed where LRH authorized criminal activity. I did see how these could be used to throw LRH under the bus and justify criminal activity. A fine distinction perhaps, but judgment has always been a crucial aspect for me to correctly apply what LRH wrote. My 2 cents worth anyhow. Bruce Pratt]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Fellow Traveller</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 13:02:32 --600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/black-propaganda.html#comment-3288</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>RE: Black Propaganda</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/black-propaganda.html#comment-3272</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The Church of David Miscavige tried a dirty Ops on me, real dirty. But they paid for it dearly. The Ops did NOTHING to harm me, the case was closed in 15 mins, the co-ordination of law enforcement behind the scenes was swift and incredible. But , being the good and intelligent whistleblower that I am, I sent the link of all the OSA Network Orders to Law enforcement for them to understand the mind set and mentality and the endemic culture of what OSA and Office of COB and RTC operate on. I merely sent them the link. http://www.keepandshare.com/doc/1985591/frank-oliver-6-6-meg?da=y (Takes a while to download) OSA Network Orders are pages 112-114 through to 148 Probably the GO raid in 1977 confiscated the earlier Guardian order versions ~ but that was in 1977 and these are newer generation law enforcement and they needed to read them. It would never have even occurred to me to do this until they tried the latest Dirty Ops. I had actually warned them to not raise the ante on me. Because of the extreme ammunition in my back pocket due to the deluge of Emails to karendelac@gmail.com, they have absolutely no idea what levels I can take this to. Per Sun Tsu “the Art of War”, I pick my battles, I don’t just blab indiscriminately. Now the atrocities of what they did to former vets who left and spoke out is quite something. I have studied previous Dirty Ops in depth from David Mayo, Stacey and Vaughn Young, Jesse Prince, Tory Christman and the extreme hate pages on Marty, Mike and so on and so on. The “Church” got away with their Dirty Ops for many decades and think that that modus operandi is workable. But the world changed. Digital communication goes viral in 5 minutes….. “Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.” Napoleon Bonaparte]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Karen#1</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 16:14:45 --600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/black-propaganda.html#comment-3272</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>private</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/black-propaganda.html#comment-3267</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Encourage others to tel others of the real situation in the church and the mis-use goings on. Word of mouth Also ecourage them to investigate themselves and look on websites of videos related to evidence given already and read up on the Australia case Senator exposing whats happened in Australia that is the best one I actually have seenand requesting its Tax status be investigated and the criminal , abuse taking place .Its not a church in reality all data needs to get out there.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>hadley</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 09:24:14 --600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/black-propaganda.html#comment-3267</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>RE: Shhhhh!!!!!! THIS IS SECRET!!!!!!</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/black-propaganda.html#comment-3266</link>
			<description><![CDATA[[quote name="Thoughtful"]Hey Bruce, Good question on the imposed restriction of issues relating to the GO. I don't know the answer, so perhaps someone else will. I would presume LRH labelled himself these HCO PLs "confidential." They are HCO PLs, after all. As a former GO staff - fully hatted and M9'd on just about every issue and most of the key directives LRH wrote for the GO - my interpretation as to why they were confidential is that it was an extension of the effort to keep entheta off the lines of public so they could get on with the business of auditing and training. The issues would have been out-reality for most public at the time they were written. One just would not want to distract parishioners and public with the entheta that the GO dealt with. The goal was to get more and more people moving up the bridge, after all! It was more expeditious to have a small, vetted cadre of staff tending to the entheta and attacks, and allow the broader public a smoother ride on the road to total freedom, so to speak. It was a need to know system focused on keeping suppression off public lines. (All LRH issues I ever saw had a specified distribution). In the context of the whole of the GO Bureaux hat(s) and the issues LRH wrote, it is clear that LRH's intent was purely to fend off attacks and black PR, to increase acceptances of Scientology, and thus allow Ethics, Tech, Admin to go in on the 3rd and 4th dynamics. It was to hold suppression (from within and without) at bay while Scientology became more indispensible to beings on earth, and the Aims accomplished. The intention was to do so legally, using an understanding of Tech and the human condition coupled with an understanding of black pr and intelligence tactics. It was believed that the attacks on LRH were quite well orchestrated by others who used these techniques. The "Snow White" program which became a pejorative, was simply to root out the false reports and sources of suppression on Scientology and handle such. Hence, "snow white." In the context of those times (1970s) citizen whistleblowing against various perceived government wrongs was accepted widely. (eg. Pentagon Papers, FBI Cointelpro operations, and others). Getting government documents that exposed wrongs was not such a bad thing, and if government files had evidence of efforts to suppress Scientology, we should have been entitled to know! Unfortunately, those who proposed and ran the operations that ended in prosecutions made mistakes and then tried to cover-up which led - as cover-ups almost always do - to disaster. (There has been a lot of exaggeration about things purportedly done, by the way). It hss always bugged me that one of the first things done on the current downslide of Scientology was the dismantling of the GO as an autonomous network. It was getting itself cleaned up after the raid. Putting the GO UNDER the Sea Org management rendered it impotent for internal security purposes. What we have now is a form of infiltration the GO would have been on the scent of and in a position to do something about - a sociopathic reptillian at the highest level. OSA is useless for this job and way misdirected. Things look so bleak now, I do almost think the Church is beyond repair. I probably wouldn't write here if Ididn't think so. What intelligent thetaful, energentic 20 year-old who might be a future mover or shaker would want to or even dare enter a Church of Scientology today? Scientology is literally reviled by a huge percentage of people - I've seen surveys saying so and observed it first hand. I just hope in decades to come that the Ethics/Tech/Admin of LRH won't be outlawed, and that there will be enough application of correct tech to stave off world-wide suppression. Revenimus! Thanks for an interesting post.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Leonore</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 04:50:45 --600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/black-propaganda.html#comment-3266</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>RE: Black Propaganda</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/black-propaganda.html#comment-3264</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I'm glad that websites like this one are exposing DM for what he is - a raving SP - but I am not optimistic that the CofS will be "fixed" if he is removed or simply blows. How did Personal Integrity and KSW #1 go so out the window with so many Scientologists (including me!) with DM in charge? It's hard not to conclude that the vast majority of folks still in the church are in a condition of treason or lower on at least one dynamic. Makes me thing the only real hope for Scientology IS the independent movement.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Independent Scientologist</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:57:26 --600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/black-propaganda.html#comment-3264</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>RE: Suppressive</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/black-propaganda.html#comment-3263</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thoughtful, I have one objection here about why Miscavige thinks crime is okay for him. If you read the PDCs (lecture Desire, Enforce, Inhibit) you will see that someone may think he has a God given right to do it. This God Given Right (GGR) is what DM is using. The only thing is that WE NOW are taking away this GGR from him because we are now many doubting his GGR whereas this was not the case before. Reality (any reality) is agreement of the many. Now, the many, do not agree anymore DM has a GGR to do what he does. THIS IS A BIG CHANGE!!! Before nobody would question that GGR of his. He is not Mr. Right anymore! Let's keep on. However, I believe, and I would like to let you know specifically on this, that if we are going to succeed we are going to have an Org Board, a 7 Div Org Board. I am calling this to your attention since I believe this is our next echelon, Organization.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Theo Sismanides</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 08:41:47 --600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/black-propaganda.html#comment-3263</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

