<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Eileen Clark Resigns</title>
		<description>Discuss Eileen Clark Resigns</description>
		<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 19:49:36 -0600</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.scientology-cult.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/290.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>HEY--EMAN</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-3573</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Great to hear from you, Eman. Yes, it is definitely me, I left in early Sept 07. I do hope all is well with you. Love, Eileen]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ceileen</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 16:33:47 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-3573</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>HELLO THERE</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-3496</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi Eileen, Is this you ??? You were on the decks with me in June, July, Aufust, September, October and maybe more 2007. This is Eman here from France. Great Doubt formula.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>EMAN - FRANCE</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 07:46:00 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-3496</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>HI KRIS!</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-2397</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Wow, I am blushing from you saying such nice things about me... thank you... :-) I do remember those tours and times in SFO. Please email me clark.ef@hotmail.com, as I would love to be in comm directly. I am so sorry to learn that you had such a hard time. Love, Eileen]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ceileen</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 17:49:00 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-2397</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Kris says:</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-2357</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Eileen, I don't normally post stuff online, I have pretty much disconnected myself from Scientology completely, but when I came across your doubt formula, I couldn't help myself. First off, we worked together a couple times in San Francisco on tour, I was at AOLA, and you were on CLO tours. Even though we were on separate tours, our goals were still the same to get people back on the bridge and winning, and you recognized the benefit of working together as a team, and we did, but what impressed me most about you, is you treated me with the upmost respect, granted me so much beingness, and helped me as much as you could, when other terminals were invalidating me, you seemed to be the only one that recognized that I was trying my best, and expressed displeasure on my behalf actually, you stuck up for me as much as you could. I will never forget you for that, I don't think I ever had a chance to say thank you, so thank you. The first tour we worked together went all right, It was the second tour in San Francisco that made me want to route out of the Sea Org, and I don't need to get into details, but I believe step 2 of your formula is applicable. Anyway, I just wanted to say hi, and let you know I hope you are doing well, you were one of my favorite people I worked with when I was in the SO, and I hope you consider me a friend, and hope you remember me.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 13:48:20 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-2357</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Hello, David St. Lawrence</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-2252</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Just wanted to say "Hi". I remember you from Flag in the 1980's. And I heard you had a Mission in Southern California. Glad to hear you are still around. I admired you greatly.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Lady Lancelot</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 00:04:04 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-2252</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Free Heber</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-2087</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Lyn, Thanks! Sorry if I seemed mysterious about Heber. There are things being done which will be evident later. I'm afraid I upset Mick so won't be talking on his site for now, but I do post here and on Marty's site as well as Jeff's. When there is something to say about Heber, everyone will know about it. Eileen]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ceileen</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:02:35 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-2087</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Free Heber</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-2037</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Elaine - I'm on the XSO list where people from the S.O. are gathered :-). When Mike Rinder wrote his article about Heber being in the hole there were several people very concerned and wanted to get something going to "free" Heber. But now you say that he's coming out? I read it, but is this true. No, I don't think you are lying - lol!! I mean can you give any details to it? Maybe you'd even like to join the XSO list owned by Mick and talk a little more about it? But, basically, I find your quick statement a "pull" towards wanting to know more :-). Oh - and I loved your doubt formula!! Warmly, Lyn]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Lyn</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 15:50:35 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-2037</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Guest says:</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-2005</link>
			<description><![CDATA[This is something I posted elsewhere, wanted to share it here, too. "Jeff and RJ are correct. C of S is, sadly, on the edge of a cliff and the person who took it there is David Miscavige. It is no longer safe or possible to speak out against outnesses in the tech, violations of policy or to question. Look around and you will find that there is other 'truth' than what dm forwards. In my earlier post when I said we were all responsible for what has happened, I was thinking of RESPONSIBILITY, DEFINITION OF HCO PL 2 MAY 85 (also issued as an HCOB, same date and title) "RESPONSIBILITY: THE NONRECOGNITION AND DENIAL OF THE RIGHT OF INTERVENTION BETWEEN ONESELF AND ANY BEING, IDEA, MATTER, ENERGY, SPACE, TIME OR FORM, AND THE ASSUMPTION OF FULL RIGHT OF DETERMINATION OVER IT." Every day dm makes himself an intervention between Scientologists and LRH, their beliefs and truth by putting forth the idea that you are wrong to question. He cannot do that without agreement. He has only the power he is given. My and others gave him that power for about 30 years. Times have changed. One becomes 'Responsible' then when you can recognize his intervention and take steps to remove him as such. That is what all independent Scientologists must do to get free of his suppression. One cannot operate in the presence of so much suppression, so we operate outside of it and are then able to be truly effective. Once you remove yourself from the suppressive environment it takes a bit of time to get yourself together. But each of us does, eventually, some sooner than others, but it does happen. That is what dm fears most, because he knows what it means for us all to join together. A group of fearless individuals is a formidable force and that is what we have become and each day we grow stronger, inexorable and that takes power from dm. That makes me very happy."]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 08:08:07 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-2005</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>FREE HEBER!!!</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-1981</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Just a few days ago, I told a friend that "the b---h is back!" I knew that I would be doing something very proactive to take out der midget, just wasn't sure exactly how that would unfold. Now I know. Heber is coming out and boy! will that be noisy!!! whooohaaaaa!!! Thanks to all you wonderful beings who have acknowledged my big step forward. Right back at you! Eileen]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ceileen</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 16:39:45 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-1981</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>TRUTH says:</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-1959</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Dear Eileen, Great doubt condition write up. Thank you! You are honorable and a beautiful thetan. We are so proud to have you in the Independent team. One more theta added!!!! :-)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>TRUTH</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 01:42:55 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-1959</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Brad Hagemo says:</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-1905</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Congratulations and very well done on standing up for truth and personal integrity. Honest beings like you not only embrace the truth but are comfortable forwarding it in the cause of spiritual freedom. With each added postulate we firm up the reality of DM's ouster and the reestablisments of LRH's church.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Brad Hagemo</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 20:29:20 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-1905</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Hola!!!</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-1897</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I see you, Kathy! Wow. Here we are. Again. email: clark.ef@hotmail.com]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ceileen</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 16:19:40 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-1897</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>just an anon says:</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-1877</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Member of anonymous here: Glad to see that you are safely away from DM and the cult. Hopefully no one will have to deal with that robber baron in the near future since if you don't bring him down we will. Best of luck to you in the future in all you do.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>just an anon</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 10:05:30 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-1877</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>You all are the best!</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-1884</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thank you all, from the bottom of my heart. Virgil, thanks for your help. Rebecca, the size of the ARCX is determined by the amount of ARC present before the ARCX. You probably had a great deal of ARC for LRH Tech when you started out. The only thing is, that is not what you got over the years. That, my dear friend, is called out-tech. Fortunately, that is something that LRH provided plenty of tech to handle. You can have what you want. There are auditors who deliver standard LRH Tech. A good one will have you flying in a few minutes. Now, THAT is what LRH intended. THAT is what we are all going to have happening again all over the place. THAT is the only reason we are all here at this site for in the first place. LRH never said it would be easy, so damn the torpedos! Where do you live? Maybe there's an auditor nearby who could help you out. I'm new at this stuff, but I do know that such help does exist in the field.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ceileen</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 01:39:35 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-1884</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Yippee!!!</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-1883</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi Eileen, I've been wondering about you for years. Glad you finally made it out. Kathy Ohla! (A wee hint of who I am.)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Kathy </dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 23:35:38 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-1883</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Barney Rubble says:</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-1882</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Wow, impressive indeed. Do not believe I knew you before, but now I do, hell yes! Good luck.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Barney Rubble</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 23:21:30 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-1882</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Doubt Condition</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-1880</link>
			<description><![CDATA[VWD on your doubt write up. I shall be more than happy to sign your Liability. :-) Zana~]]></description>
			<dc:creator>DragonFly</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 22:58:30 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-1880</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Looking In says:</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-1878</link>
			<description><![CDATA[To those of you who don't know Eileen, we are talking not just a heavy hitter, but someone known and loved by many. And someone who knows what HELP really is. I am still under the radar but shot up into enthusiasm when I read Eileen's announcement. Good job and looking forward to talking to you!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Looking In</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 22:21:48 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-1878</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>helmut Flasch says:</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-1876</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Look forward to a trementous increase in energy, happines, & generall stats -- It happend magicly to me and my wife Hellen. you hav found (again) the freedoom you came to SCN. love Helmut]]></description>
			<dc:creator>helmut Flasch</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:40:56 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-1876</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>you are - you are my friend</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-1875</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The way I see SCN to progress is that ther wil be 1000's of smal and larger groups - delivering what tey like to deliver. as in "mission and ethics" PL Ron stateshat groups who deliver good tech and are are basicly ethical will survive to that degree. You, rebeca will deside who gives you whta auditing or training. it is - will be you and the book. trust yourself enough to interprett it the right way - your way -- I am class V and OEC & OT IV and have never appplied another standard !! in teh end it is us (you for you & me for me) who will have to travel the road !!! Love Helmut]]></description>
			<dc:creator>helmut Flasch</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:35:46 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-1875</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>You Go Girl!</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-1874</link>
			<description><![CDATA[You will find that life gets better and better as time goes on. Just being outside the walls of the Church of Miscavige can produce more case gain than you might ever expect. You are now free to be, do, and have whatever is best for you on all dynamics. The action of publishing your Doubt Formula will unlock your creativity and can restore your zest for life. Enjoy!!! If there is anything I can do to assist you, give me a call. David St Lawrence - Old Auditor]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David St Lawrence</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 18:47:24 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-1874</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Welcome</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-1873</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thank you, Eileen. Terrific Doubt write-up. This is the kind of honesty scientology was developed for. Now, the fun begins again, for real!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Marta</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 18:40:35 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-1873</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Will the Real Scientology Please Stand Up?</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-1872</link>
			<description><![CDATA[My active years in Scientology were from 1969 through 1989. During those years I got many briefings about how the application of the technology had been denegrated (due to various individuals, none of them LRH), and with each briefing, I was promised that this time there really was "100% standard tech" and all I had to do was sign up and redo whatever it was that had gone amiss. If it had happened once, I'd be forgiving. If it had happened twice, I'd still be forgiving. If it had happened three times, I'd have wondered but I'd have probably let it slide. But over 20 some-odd years, it happened at least half a dozen times, and ultimately I arrived at the only logical conclusion: it's not possible for the application of "standard technology" to go amiss so often, especially when the primary focus off Scientologist's is the precise delivery of LRH standard technology. When I finally realized the technology was -- clearly -- no longer standard and/or reliable, I quit. My memory is solid: I hadn't forgotten the prior broken promise of standard tech. If those promises hadn't been broken, we'd still have the same grade chart I learned in 1969 with, perhaps, additions authored solely by LRH. Any changes after his death -- including the "refresher" sec checks -- are unquestionably squirrel. Doubt that and you doubt the whole premise of standard technology AND you're in violation of Keeping Scientology Working. Excuse me for stepping on your toes: I also wanted Scientology to work. But -- once the little dictator is gone -- who is going to be in charge of deciding what constitutes the true standard technology? And how are the rest of us going to believe him or her?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 18:39:44 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-1872</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>RJ says:</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-1870</link>
			<description><![CDATA[A threat of seeming redundant (something I try to avoid) but can't seem to be avoided. Bravo!!!!!! Eileen. Glad to have you on our team :-)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>RJ</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 17:55:29 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-1870</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sharon says:</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-1867</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Bravo Eileen!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sharon</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:59:44 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-1867</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jim logan says:</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-1863</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Very well done Doubt. Nice to have another coming up alongside. Man, it's a good day!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>jim logan</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:30:13 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-1863</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>great  formula</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-1860</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Welcome to the Independents Eileen! Very glad to see you leaving the Mestology off source group - from another Vet(Ex)SO & LRH friend & ex pers staff.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sinar</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:35:56 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-1860</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Welcome</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-1854</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Love the doubt formula Ilene. It has conviction in every word. Get ready for the adventure of a lifetime - the adventure of putting Scientology back on track. ML Virg]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Virgil Samms</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 10:35:43 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-1854</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Boyd H says:</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-1852</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I can see the squirrel gradually diminishing in importance to Scientologists everywhere, and this is important because LRH needs to be able to have the final say on the tech once again. That's not the case in the church right now. Well done Eileen. Another 25 year veteran stands up!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Boyd H</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 05:29:14 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/eilene-clark.html#comment-1852</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
