<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>CNN vs David Miscavige</title>
		<description>Discuss CNN vs David Miscavige</description>
		<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/cnn-vs-david-miscavige.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 17:24:34 -0600</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.scientology-cult.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/287.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Friendly vs Hostile</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/cnn-vs-david-miscavige.html#comment-1862</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It seems anyone who speaks on behalf of C of S publicly should view, study, and drill the video taped interview of LRH in I believe 1968, by GRANADA Productions. It's on Youtube. LRH was firm, direct, friendly, even cheerful at times. He applied live, friendly, respectful attitudes in his communications with his interviewer. Also, he showed friendly interest in the conversation generally. In C of S, this would be called a good application of "TRs," meaning applying those factors that should be present in the activity of communication for actual communication to occur. The unfriendly and hostile emotional tones manifested by the C of S speakers in such interviews as the Anderson Cooper recent ones are presenting a rather harsh, serious, hostile, and threatening demeanor to the public at large. This can't be good PR. Once again, take a look at the LRH interview with GRANADA and take the hint. Good Luck.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>R.Riley</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 09:20:06 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/cnn-vs-david-miscavige.html#comment-1862</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>DragonFly says:</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/cnn-vs-david-miscavige.html#comment-1843</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I hope this whole CNN expose brings the Gov't down on that little suppressive troll. I not only hope that his crimes are fully exposed, but that he does jail time and has to pay back all of the money he spent irresponsibly on himself and the mest. ~]]></description>
			<dc:creator>DragonFly</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 21:54:51 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/cnn-vs-david-miscavige.html#comment-1843</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>RJ says:</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/cnn-vs-david-miscavige.html#comment-1837</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Interesting that they'd bring out old Norman Starky after all these years in virtual captivity. My take is that they made him executor of Ron's estate 'Trust B' was because he was easily malleable which is probably why they wanted Mary Sue out of the way because she wasn't. Once 'Trust B' was transfered to CST under the '"Secret" Closing Agreement', he was dropped into a deep dark hole and almost forgotten till now which shows the current Church's level of desperation at this point. The main problem I see with this strategy is that once this hermitically sealed dungeon of the past is opened up. People may start asking questions. Some may ask how this incompetent old fool who can't even string a coherent sentence together ever became the controller of all Scientology and Dianetic copyrights and what is the real story behind this? Not that I don't feel the pain of anyone who has been assaulted by the diminutive psychopathic "Pope" but I think there is a bigger story behind it. A story that to me is more intriguing than little "Slappy's" tantrums.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>RJ</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:39:24 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/cnn-vs-david-miscavige.html#comment-1837</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>lunamoth says:</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/cnn-vs-david-miscavige.html#comment-1836</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thoughtful, I responded to this post on Marty's site, but it's worth repeating here: Wonderful. Just wonderful. Thanks you for not backing down, and for continuing to put the truth out there as many times as is it takes. I admire your courage and your effectiveness.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>lunamoth</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:18:22 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/cnn-vs-david-miscavige.html#comment-1836</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
