<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Boyd Hutchins </title>
		<description>Discuss Boyd Hutchins </description>
		<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/boyd-hutchins-ex-so.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 19:49:58 -0600</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.scientology-cult.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/237.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Sarah</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/boyd-hutchins-ex-so.html#comment-4849</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Had a dream about u ..,,]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sarah leclair</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 22:04:18 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/boyd-hutchins-ex-so.html#comment-4849</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Boyd H says:</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/boyd-hutchins-ex-so.html#comment-1022</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Sherry, You did the right thing, LRH wrote org pgm #1 for a reason. People look at org program #1 as "historical" or "not used now" but senior policy says that takes precedence. People can read it and see it would be a good thing but there's so much force holding in place this idea that RTC has some master plan with a number of programs running in one dept. with a 30 man org with three people on study. DM has even talked about this before in one of his verbal tech conferences and he's spotted the multiple programs outpoint himself but then even years later he did nothing to change it. I remember a moment when DM was kind of off the cuff and he says something like "there needs to be a program which undercuts the fact that high level programs aren't going in". Yeah there's a couple LRH programs already for that but you haven't allowed that to happen for years, Dave. You and Mary Jo both got this movement up to the next level, thanks again. Li Po, Martin and Dragonfly, thanks. Chuck, I agree with large parts of that. I don't know about a college course prereq but I think I know where what you're getting at. I think the CLO's need to start small. The concept of gradients need to be reintroduced into management. One time someone at FLO ordered that no Ext Comm was to call orgs anymore. It lasted for about two weeks. Realistically a CLO needs to put this in in one org, handling it using missions then withdrawing, and never calling. Then when that one's under control they move onto the next one until eventually there's no flappy orgs. But the rest of the orgs they should just keep managing in the same squirrel way. Eventually every org exec council would be FEBC's and it would keep moving up that way. No calls to orgs period could be mandated at that point, each org would have several stable terminals. The CLO doesn't have the resources to be going out and firing missions to all orgs but they can work up to that. The policies in mission school packs about sending out a vet. missionaire with someone green and building up the pool that way have been out so long that it would take a while to get consistent results but it's the only way. You have a good point about the WDC and exec strat level having to be hatted. DM isn't building up anything right now. If he cared he'd have people studying and getting the experience but he sent them all to the hall. I wonder what's going through Yager and Leserve's heads right now when they think about DM not getting an experienced crew lined up for the future... Also I heard the OEC/FEBC training for Class V staff is almost totally dead right now.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Boyd H</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 02:23:08 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/boyd-hutchins-ex-so.html#comment-1022</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Li Po says:</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/boyd-hutchins-ex-so.html#comment-1032</link>
			<description><![CDATA["With even a halfway decent Inspector General functioning (not a COB), what I'm describing would be near the top of the list of things to handle. IT'S THE FLAG-FOLO-ORG line! It's probably half the reason the Sea Org exists. And Miscavige has alter-is'd it for 20 plus years. He calls the shots." You nail it, man! In a little org (let's say a "normal" org), it was the best way to create a madhouse! As Ron says in OEC 7, you create a huge ARC break if you distract somebody from the job he is on. Don't permit him to finish his cycle of action and you will get a wonderful upset! This insanity happened weeks after weeks... Thanks for your integrity, StarsAwait]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Li Po</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 14:10:05 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/boyd-hutchins-ex-so.html#comment-1032</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Good work</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/boyd-hutchins-ex-so.html#comment-1010</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Good luck on your current noble adventure in Haiti. Thanks for stepping forward. Your postings have provided a valuable contribution to the overall picture of a church that has gone bad. A lot of what you wrote has an awfully famililiar ring to it when looking at the UK scene since the early 80s. I look forward to hearing a lot more from you.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Martin Padfield</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 18:15:33 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/boyd-hutchins-ex-so.html#comment-1010</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Chuck Beatty says:</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/boyd-hutchins-ex-so.html#comment-1009</link>
			<description><![CDATA[thanks for being public about it all, Boyd. I'd recommend you for WDC Sea Org, or at the ILO level, I'd recommend you for "D/CO CLOs ILO" for a few years, and then WDC Sea Org. Even though I'm NOT a Scientologist nor Sea Org member, nor will ever be one again, I do wish someone who thinks with the Hubbard stuff, who takes it seriously, and if someday in the future when Miscavige is out of the picture, that whoever is left standing at the top ranks of the Sea Org, if those new people are smart enough to order a wide unconditional International Amnesty, and they undeclare all the tens of thousands of people incorrectly declared SP, I hope some of the ex members who were/are saner, go back and lend a hand to fix up the mess. I think whoever does really take the full task of figuring out how to apply Hubbard's full layout of top management rules/regulartions, there will need to be some thoughtful RETIREMENT of some of Hubbard's rules and procedures (the OSA tactics for one, are just recurring problem causing tactics that have to be stopped someday). If the independent movement grows and grows, that will be a problem Scientology will have to face eventually. If I were at the top of SCientology, I'd: a) Declare an unconditional International Amnesty and then see the fireworks and confusion that blows off from that, alone. b) Somehow retire Miscavige c) man up WDC and Exec Strata, and give them 5-10 years of hatting, including outside college education and specialized outside education in religion history, stuff to make them actual sane leaders of Scientology, NOT just Hubbard material. c) Make Sea Org staff contracts more like military contracts, 5 year clumps of re-signing. Allow for honorable discharge. Screw the Freeloader debt as an automatic, and Freeloader bills only to those that didn't pull their weight, which almost all Sea Org members DID pull their weights in their years and decades in the Sea Org, sheesh! In the meantimes, if the independent movement people just act like normal citizens, be decent to one another, official Scientology will have to take notice, and maybe somehow Miscavige will retire himself one way or the other. IN many ways, this independent movement is "wearing the hat" that the top leadership of the official Scientology movement has failed to wear. Namely had Exec Strata researched out the blocks going on that really DO matter, they'd have come to the same conclusions that the independents have come to. Prices are just out of reach to the average citizen. The upper Sea Org fad rules are resulting in a growing independent movement. Minimally, the Exec Strata and WDC members should be allowed to surf the internet, and absorb the valid complaints against the movement, and DEAL with those complaints. Chuck Beatty ex Sea Org (1975-2003)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Chuck Beatty</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:40:55 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/boyd-hutchins-ex-so.html#comment-1009</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Thank you Boyd...</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/boyd-hutchins-ex-so.html#comment-1006</link>
			<description><![CDATA[For such a great write up. I have to admit I was sad after reading LRH's HCOPL and realizing that was then, and this is now. I really believe Miscavige needs a goldenrod SP declare. ~]]></description>
			<dc:creator>DragonFly</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:07:58 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/boyd-hutchins-ex-so.html#comment-1006</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Boyd H says:</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/boyd-hutchins-ex-so.html#comment-1004</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thought provoking, thanks, there's going to be something more in depth soon. Tom, Sinar and BC Boy thanks for all you're doing. Mary Jo I appreciate it. Posting your KR's early on was key to getting this off the ground. RJ, yeah there's been a "networks handle it all" rationale since the New Era of Management. "Network cross policing" was DM's "final solution".]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Boyd H</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:02:07 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/boyd-hutchins-ex-so.html#comment-1004</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Thank you Boyd!</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/boyd-hutchins-ex-so.html#comment-1003</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Reading your account from inside blew a ton of charge for me. These are the exact insanities I experienced as the Tech Sec of Pasadena. Programs on top of undone programs on top of other undone programs. All of them unrealistic in the first place given the lack of resources to complete even one of them. Insane telexes coming in and computer generated to boot, demanding completion of targets for some program written blanketly to orgs. For instance, I once got a program sent to me directly from the A/Tech Aide CLO WUS(no bother to go thru my senior) that was written god only knows how many years back, for whatever was going on in the AO's Solo Courses. The targets were crazy and not even applicable to our little Class V Org. Of course, when I protested, queried, refused to go off policy..I was the one targeted as "a troublemaker". Oh boy..could I get on a roll here. So thanks for your write up. I look forward to hearing more from you. Sherry Katz]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sherry Katz</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:01:06 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/boyd-hutchins-ex-so.html#comment-1003</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Thought provoking says:</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/boyd-hutchins-ex-so.html#comment-1000</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Welcome home, Boyd! Loved your write up! Again it shows that staff are trying to put in KSW but won't be heard. We are not a bunch of disgruntled Scientologists. Thank you for the stat update. I would love to hear more on that, particularly the stats of the ideal orgs, morbid curiousity overcomes me.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Thought provoking</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:31:42 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/boyd-hutchins-ex-so.html#comment-1000</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>BC Boy says:</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/boyd-hutchins-ex-so.html#comment-997</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thanks Boyd, I hope OSA is reading this article. It's another great example of what happens when you don't follow policy.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>BC Boy</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 08:29:47 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/boyd-hutchins-ex-so.html#comment-997</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Boyd H says:</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/boyd-hutchins-ex-so.html#comment-991</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Paolo you summed it up. There is so much competence in the SO. The group taken on it's own was an impressive crew. I'd like to rejoin after we fix this. My affinity isn't alloyed for those FOLO and network managers who I knew there. They worked long long hours with dedication but unfortunately the net result was down stats. That same dedication level put towards managing correctly is the goal.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Boyd H</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 20:15:20 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/boyd-hutchins-ex-so.html#comment-991</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Boyd H says:</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/boyd-hutchins-ex-so.html#comment-990</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Jim, Mem off Int is Membership Off Int which is in charge of increasing IAS memberships, not regging money. This same person was the FLO Rep CLO EUS back then, mentioned in this story, and a good friend of mine. It was impossible to manage. There are more specifics tying in exactly how DM caused this but I figured I'd leave it for another time to keep it short because that needs an article. Thanks for help digging up the reference and for writing such great posts everyday. To get a picture of the FOLO in action imagine them sitting in data files looking at screens then typing away at their desks then going to meetings. Nothing happens. "This is the Sea Org. Our business is missions." -LRH Joe, Thanks, you're one of my favorite writers, I love your new article, you did good by LRH IMO. I think staff do know it's crap but like me there was a big non-confront there for a long time because we had no venue to change it like we do now.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Boyd H</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:57:43 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/boyd-hutchins-ex-so.html#comment-990</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Joe Howard says:</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/boyd-hutchins-ex-so.html#comment-986</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Boyd, I've been enjoying your posts for some time now. Glad to see your official declaration of independence. Looks like even the staff know they are living in a house of cards. With each Int event I'll bet that their disaffection grows. How can they see all the fancy visual effects gra[censored]s and not know it's all crap?! At any rate, welcome!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Joe Howard</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:41:18 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/boyd-hutchins-ex-so.html#comment-986</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Tom says:</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/boyd-hutchins-ex-so.html#comment-995</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Boyd, Great write-up. I also really appreciate the stat data. You said "I paid my freeloader debt and paid for 12 intensives and gave some money to the IAS but I was tired." Failed purpose? :-) If so, I think you are in the right place.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:04:11 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/boyd-hutchins-ex-so.html#comment-995</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mary Jo says:</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/boyd-hutchins-ex-so.html#comment-994</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Dear Boyd, Thank you and welcome! It was a relief to read this, an account from inside a CLO! I can relate from a public viewpoint: I observed and reported how CLO LATAM was butchering the orgs and field, directly running the "Ideal Org" programs - otherwise known as "crush reg the public dry for buildings (and books, Libraries and IAS, among other things)". The OTCs disappeared back into the Non-E ranges they were at when I had started running the area. The actual stats of Scientology expansion disappeared, the only up-trending gra[censored] was "funds raised for buildings" which isn't even an LRH stat! When I wrote this up to COB there was no answer, and RTC simply sent my reports to CLO Latam for handling! Those were the guys that were violating the policies and demanding every ED of every org of the entire cont do the same! So there went my hope for reform. I am sure this is the case in every cont. It is both pathetic and infuriating how the CLOs sold their soul to the devil a long while ago. Again, thanks for all your past and future contributions! I look forward to more articles. Love, Mary Jo]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mary Jo</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:23:15 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/boyd-hutchins-ex-so.html#comment-994</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jim logan says:</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/boyd-hutchins-ex-so.html#comment-985</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Boyd, Wow!! Thanks for that write-up and the de-brief on the areas. That dog's breakfast you describe would make it impossible to manage. Man, what a dog's breakfast. I'm bolstered immensely by your contribution to the resolution of the scene. It's not a 'welcome back' because you've obviously never left, but 'thanks for sticking through', my friend and colleague. p.s. what is Mem Off Int? Cheers.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>jim logan</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:15:35 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/boyd-hutchins-ex-so.html#comment-985</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>RJ says:</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/boyd-hutchins-ex-so.html#comment-993</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the background Boyd. I remember when Observation and Action Missions were pretty routine and started to kinda fade to black in the early '90s, about the time Miscavige announced a "New Era of Management" where orgs supposedly ran themselves. Followed of course by the "Golden Age of Tech" that supposedly didn't need a "gazillion technical experts" or a Snr C/S Int any longer. About the time that Davy decided to eliminate Div 6s with Tom Cruise and all policy with 'Message to Garcia' was about the time I decided to get the hell outta Dodge. You see all those nice pictures of Dave's ideal ideal org totally void of public and staff. You sorta get an idea of what the lil' guy's aiming for.... Real estate. The Church of Century 21 :-)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>RJ</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:59:13 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/boyd-hutchins-ex-so.html#comment-993</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sinar says:</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/boyd-hutchins-ex-so.html#comment-992</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Boyd, Thanks for the great post, it really exposes an area many of us aren't aware of. This really then raises the question of where Int Management really is -in the Hall??? Welcome to the Independents!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sinar</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:24:04 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/boyd-hutchins-ex-so.html#comment-992</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Paolo  says:</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/boyd-hutchins-ex-so.html#comment-988</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thanks Boyd. What a pity that management gets done that squirrel way... I am certain there are quite a lot of good administrators in the Sea Org even right now, yet they are constantly cross ordered and micro managed into non existence. Basic policies aren't being applied, no wise planning gets done, just emergencies and flaps. It seems that the main strategy of CSI right now is no strategy at all but just a dramatization of somebody who perhaps hasn't sold a book, delivered an auditing session or tried to sup a basic course since long long time. HCOPL Ethics and Executive (3 May PL) certainly applies to that situation in that whoever is in command just sees and puts there a false environment "to handle". Paolo]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Paolo </dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 11:50:07 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/boyd-hutchins-ex-so.html#comment-988</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
