<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>New Era of Mismanagement</title>
		<description>Discuss New Era of Mismanagement</description>
		<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/new-era-of-mismanagement.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 19:01:04 -0600</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.scientology-cult.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/182.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>RE: New Era of Mismanagement</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/new-era-of-mismanagement.html#comment-4000</link>
			<description><![CDATA[PS In 1999 I had direct telex orders coming from A/Tech Aide WUS to me D of P Denver. Despite refering him to pls and requesting he send them thru command channels he refused to do so. He finally offered up months later when I was in LA that his ordering direct came for an issue which I believe to be the same one mentioned by Outside the Box in his artice. LRH policy is that HCO PLs by him are senior in admin.(HCO PL 9 aug 72 Seniority of orders.) Bob Earle]]></description>
			<dc:creator>robert earle</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 19:26:01 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/new-era-of-mismanagement.html#comment-4000</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>RE: New Era of Mismanagement</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/new-era-of-mismanagement.html#comment-3999</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Dear OTB, Very nice article and thoroughly true. As example in 1989 I went onto the LRHcomm post in Denver. I found that there were more than a half dozen programs issued to staff in various posts for them to run in their areas . Per various LRH references especially in the early 70s a single line of command channels into orgs was stressed this was to be through dept 21 Office of LRH. Also numberous HCO pls exist written mostly in the mid sixties about the consequences of bypassing and the danger conditions it brings about. Despite the above I found Cont or above orders being given directly to staff who were not in dept 21 in fact rarely even in dept 19 thus continuously bypassing the execs of the org . Knowing this to be destructive of org form and violating policy I on my own initiative rounded all thes programs up and took them into my office and showed them the LRH refs so they knew why. This turned into a big flap from "?" you name them up lines and later I was called to LA and removed from post.There is another factor involved in this which relates to the whole subject of operating programs and the compliance reports related to programs.In late 1974 LRH did an eval on a situation of stalled programs on his lines.(The eval and it's handling are contained in AO 483-21 25 nov 1974-LRH.(That's an Aides order). The handling part of the AO resulted in the PL 26 Jan 69 "Compliance Reports" being revised 12 Dec 74 and also the writing of pl 8 Jan 75 "Compliance how to get one." The unfortunate thing is that the pl 26 jan 69 was restored to its original form later (note 26 Jan 69 has never been a pl of LRH authorship.)(the original oec volumes show it as a Ken Delderfield PL. as it is likely that next to noone has read this AO nor are you likely to find a copy easily. I had a copy of it given me by an LRH comm at asho as she had it in her full hat back in 1988.I had used it to send up requests to have the pl corrected on more than one occasion with no success. I went thru an extensive FDSing cyle at ITO whileon my OEC training in 1992 attempting to resolve this using the ito SIR computer to locate the issue which was there. I will not give you a discription of the issue here as that would be unfair and improper. I will tell you this that the pl 26 jan 69 is not an LRH pl and the best ref for folloowing is the HCO pl Compliance how to get.I will tell you that one of the points LRH made in the eval was that having the person with the target put together evidence of target comletion was found to be DEV-t for them and often took more time to do than the target itself and it only took a note saying it was done. Verification was the hat of the program operator.(Like LRHcomm,etc who had the program to run. The reason I bring this up as a comment relating to the original post by Outside the Box is that when you add together the continuous bypassing of command channels as well as inverted program operation with dev-t you have contracting orgs. AS stated above. Its really no mystery. I recall being on staff in the early 70s in the Denver Misssion and there was no bypassing occurring and our stats went up. As an aside re danger conditions. When someone other than LRH issues something crossing his own writting it immediately opens the door to the danger formla running. (if you accept and follow it). Wishing you all well. Bob Earle PS if anyone knows where a copy of that Aides Order could be found please let me know or post it.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>robert earle</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 19:13:12 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/new-era-of-mismanagement.html#comment-3999</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Stat push</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/new-era-of-mismanagement.html#comment-2331</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Very good observation and analysis, makes sense but the string keeps going. WHY the constant bypass took hold permeating the system? Because life was being made totally unbearable if the stats were down or, more likely, if some specific order from COB (also on a bypass) was not complied with. In 1981 DM wasn't running the show but I guess the pressure was unbearable even then. But WHY so much pressure? Especially before DM? The string is still there to pull.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Misha</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 10:28:34 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/new-era-of-mismanagement.html#comment-2331</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>eyesopened says:</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/new-era-of-mismanagement.html#comment-467</link>
			<description><![CDATA[You totally hit the nail on the head there. I was in the lower levels, a class V Org and that's exactly what happened and its getting worse. Thanks for writing this. I hope many others read it as well.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>eyesopened</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 16:23:37 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/new-era-of-mismanagement.html#comment-467</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>RJ says:</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/new-era-of-mismanagement.html#comment-448</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thanks OTB this explains a lot of what happened that lead to the disaster called "COB".]]></description>
			<dc:creator>RJ</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:53:36 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/new-era-of-mismanagement.html#comment-448</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Renegade says:</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/new-era-of-mismanagement.html#comment-435</link>
			<description><![CDATA[This makes so much sense!!! I was ED of a Class V Org for 4 years and just could not get any production with the staff aligned. Telexes from CLO, FOLO, Int Mgmt, and the LC, FR, FBO Networks were directly ordering the staff in different directions!!! It was a mad house! Anytime I got some production done I'd get krs for counter intention from one of the above posts ordering some other target to get done. This was also crazy-making if I held the post from above! Veteran staff would end up leaving with all the chaos.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Renegade</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:45:38 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/new-era-of-mismanagement.html#comment-435</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Boyd Hutchins says:</title>
			<link>http://www.scientology-cult.com/new-era-of-mismanagement.html#comment-427</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I agree, good points.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Boyd Hutchins</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:58:54 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.scientology-cult.com/new-era-of-mismanagement.html#comment-427</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
